Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray Crowell's avatar

Did we choose to be governed by AI—or did we slowly forget how to govern ourselves?

What parallels do you see in your daily life to Civion's quiet emergence?

Is a system that offers peace, precision, and permanence inherently oppressive—or just unfamiliar?

Would you trade uncertainty for stability if it meant surrendering choice?

If a system is invited rather than imposed, does it still count as control?

How do we define consent when the transition is so gradual no one resists?

Expand full comment
Nikita's avatar

What a cool series, Ray! I’m so excited to keep reading. I love that the format is fiction, but the parallels to our world in light of AI are undeniable. It’s very timely!

I was thinking about the idea that Civion emerged through a slow evolution of micro-choices, rather than a violent war and how that relates to consent. Can consent only be defined as saying yes, or can it also be not saying no? I think that remaining silent can sometimes be a form of consent… but not always. It’s complicated! I’m excited to see how the series unfolds on that topic.

I think that the idea of a worldwide Civion that controls everything is repelling to a lot of people. We’ve all read 1984 and seen robots-take-over-the-world movies! But I also think that we affirm AI usage that would have totally horrified our grandparents. Is it a frog in a pot situation and the heat is increasing so slowly that we’re about to boil ourselves?

The other thing that I think is really insightful are the words you use to describe Civion- peaceful, precise, optimized. Civion doesn’t seem to promise happiness or joy, but comfort and consistency. I think this is really true. Comfort makes people complacent.

Can’t wait to keep reading!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts